Share
VULNERABILITY DETAILS
It's possible to use the NTLM reflection attack to escape a browser sandbox in the case where the
sandboxed process is allowed to create TCP sockets. In particular, I was able to combine the issues
mentioned below with a bug in Chromium to escape its sandbox.

## HTTP -> SMB NTLM reflection
This is a long known attack that was described, for example, in
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=222. As far as I can tell, MS16-075 was
supposed to to fix it by blocking attempts to reflect NTLM authentication operating in the same
machine mode (not sure about the actual internal term for that). However, it's still possible to
reflect NTLM authentication that works in the regular remote mode, and an attacker can force the
parties to use the remote mode, for example, by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_OEM_DOMAIN_SUPPLIED
flag in the initial NEGOTIATE_MESSAGE message.

In the actual exploit, a compromised sandboxed process acts as both a web server and an SMB client,
and asks the browser to visit http://localhost:[fake_webserver_port]. The browser receives an NTLM
authentication request and considers the `localhost` domain to be safe to automatically log on with
the current user's credentials. The sandboxed process forwards the corresponding packets to the
local SMB server.

The problem here is that since the established session is considered remotely authenticated, it's
not allowed to access administrative shares unless the browser process runs at the high integrity
level. Therefore, another bug is required to gain file system access.

## Insufficient path check in EFSRPC
The Encrypting File System Remote Protocol is a Remote Procedure Call interface that is used to
manage data objects stored in an encrypted form. It supports backing up and restoring files over
SMB, among other things. Functions like `EfsRpcOpenFileRaw` implement security checks, i.e., they
forbid remote users to pass regular file paths. However, if the attacker passes a UNC path of the
form `\\localhost\C$\...`, `lsass.exe` will initiate a new SMB connection while impersonating the
calling user, but this time using the same machine mode authentication; therefore it will be
permitted to access the C$ share.

The exploit saves the payload on the user's disk (the easiest way might be just to force it to be
auto-downloaded as a .txt file) and calls the EFSRPC methods to copy it as an .exe file to the
user's Startup folder.

There's also another path check bypass that has been found by James Forshaw. `EfsRpcOpenFileRaw`
accepts file paths starting with `\\.\C:\...`, presumably thinking that it's a UNC path since it
starts with two back-slashes. Please note that this variant also works in the case where a regular
user's credentials are relayed to another machine in a domain, so it might have wider security
implications.

It's also worth mentioning that the `efsrpc` named pipe might not be enabled by default, but the
same RPC endpoint is available on the `lsass` named pipe with UUID
[c681d488-d850-11d0-8c52-00c04fd90f7e].

REPRODUCTION CASE
The proof-of-concept is based on [impacket](https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/). It's a
collection of Python classes that supports working with SMB and MSRPC.
1. Run `start.cmd`, which downloads impacket from Github, applies the patch, and starts the server.
2. Open http://localhost/ in a Chromium-based browser.
3. You should see a new .exe file appearing on your desktop.

VERSION
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17134.648]

REFERENCES
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-nlmp/b38c36ed-2804-4868-a9ff-8dd3182128e4
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-efsr/08796ba8-01c8-4872-9221-1000ec2eff31


Proof of Concept:
https://github.com/offensive-security/exploitdb-bin-sploits/raw/master/bin-sploits/47115.zip